Menu
Okay, I thought I understood how this worked, but clearly I was wrong. For some reason, the following layout works fine until I start trying to place images into the table cells. I was under the impression that using “height=100% width=100%” caused the image to fill the available space (and I’ve seen it do this before), but what is happening here is completely different.
As soon as I put in images, it starts ignoring the parameters I’ve given for the table (and what’s really wonky is, I’ve tried different images in that bottom cell, and they all come out the same way.. any image wider than it is tall has the same effect – if you don’t feel like d/ling the jpeg I attached, feel free to use your own). Internet Explorer and Mozilla seem to react to it differently, but neither one is doing what I want.
Note that setting height to 100% and leaving the width blank causes the image to appear in the correct manner, but the cell remains stretched way off into nowhere.
I’ve tried all kinds of variations on adding extra information to the table rows and cells to specify exactly what they are supposed to be, to no avail, and even tried using blocks with css, STILL getting bad results. Could someone please either tell me what I’m doing wrong, or show me another way to do it?
[CODE]<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<table border=1 width=100% height=100%>
<tr height=79%>
<td width=71%>1
</td>
<td rowspan=2 width=29%>2
</td>
</tr>
<tr height=21%>
<td>
<img src=”bottom_bg.jpg” height=100% width=100%>
</td>
</tr>
</table
</body>
</html>
[upl-file uuid=a820ee7a-28ba-43eb-bf05-bdc1f4172678 size=24kB]bottom_bg.jpg