Perhaps this is the wrong forum.
I’m contemplating on buying yet another PC and then utilize the one I’ve got working now as a web server. Primarily to cut costs on web hosting, but also to make testing of web design for sites easier (with all the scripting then being on my server).
Can anyone give some hints as to the pros and cons of server software. I’m definitely not into MS server software, so am going for Unix (mostly because that’s where my experience stems from).
Would like to know more about Linux working with Apache or FreeBSD or perhaps Sun Solaris. I am probably confusing OS with server software here since I’m not that experienced, yet.
Anyone? ?
./configure --with-apxs2=/dootserv/bin/apxs --with-openssl=/openssl --enable-bcmath --enable-calendar --enable-ftp --with-mysql=/usr/local/mysqlserv[/quote]
The root file browser is by far my most used tool, but it simply isn't there on Mandrake.[/QUOTE]You mean a file browser running su root? I'm sure Mandrake has had that and a root console on the menu tree, too. As with a lot of distros, the Mandrake-defined menu is pretty bad (too much poorly arranged content). That's where the stripped down desktops like Xandros really have an ease of use advantage for the non-developer.
[i]Originally posted by ray326 [/i]There are things I dislike about mandrake, like this. But one advantage of mandrake is just the big fact that installation of software is less painfull, I no longer have to log in and out of root the way I have this all setup. I find it a notch more conveiniant then SuSE. But then again, I have never tried to run a server on either... I originally used SuSE thinking I was going to run a Mono server, but I never got around to taking mono on a test drive. I plan on getting familiar with SuSE again in the future. As for the comments about red hat earlier: red hat is nasty compared to some of the other distros since it is no longer being updated should really not be used anymore... it is not practical. I would like to try TSL one day since it is completely geared for server use. All of this would be just poking around of course... I am a win server guy.
[B]You mean a file browser running su root? I'm sure Mandrake has had that and a root console on the menu tree, too. As with a lot of distros, the Mandrake-defined menu is pretty bad (too much poorly arranged content). That's where the stripped down desktops like Xandros really have an ease of use advantage for the non-developer. [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by Wolfe [/i]How is software going to 'fry' a hard drive? Sounds like pebcak to me.
[B]Well there aren't many differnces but I think both SuSE and Mandrake sucks. Especially Mandrake, that thing fried one of my harddrives (seriously, fried it!) [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by PeOfEo [/i]Seriously; I have no friggin' idea. I - never thought it was possible. Sorry for the mixup, though. It didn't fry (just a figure of speech). It just stopped functioning.
[B]How is software going to 'fry' a hard drive? Sounds like pebcak to me. [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by PeOfEo [/i]
[B]from what I have heard fedora is just redhat with some glitter. [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by Wolfe [/i]
[B]So Mandrake works for 5 day's, right? I only use MPlayer, XMMS, Open office, TuxRacer, some other apps and games, and one day I just couldn't get the thing started. I kept getting an error saying there was no harddrive to boot from.
I just didn't bother with it, was only a 6GB harddrive anyways. [/B][/QUOTE]
0.1.9 — BETA 6.17