@Stephen_PhilbinOct 01.2004 — #If you want the image to adjust in size to acomodate the resolution then just define the images size in relative units. Percent, I think, might be best.
@ray326Oct 01.2004 — #Images should never be resized by the browser. They should always be used in their original sizes and the height and width attributes should be set to match their physical pixel dimensions.
@IncaWarriorOct 02.2004 — #get rid of that table you have up there and make it : [code=php] <div id="top"> <img src="..." alt=".." /> <ul><li>.</li><li>....</ul> <img src="...1.." alt=".." class="fright" /> <img src="...2.." alt=".." class="fright" /> </div> [/code] then have the menu items in that list and two images below
[B]Images should never be resized by the browser. They should always be used in their original sizes and the height and width attributes should be set to match their physical pixel dimensions. [/B][/QUOTE]
Why is that? Is it something to do with browsers interpreting the percentage values in different ways, or because or the sacrifice in picture quality or what?
@ray326Oct 03.2004 — #[i]Originally posted by Mr Herer [/i]
[B]Why is that? Is it something to do with browsers interpreting the percentage values in different ways, or because or the sacrifice in picture quality or what? [/B][/QUOTE] Primarily the latter but the intent of those attributes is not to facilitate rescaling of images on the fly, the intent is to tell the browser the pixel size of the images so that it can go ahead and render the page while the images are downloading.
@Stephen_PhilbinOct 03.2004 — #By the sounds of it you should do what I've always done so far and provide a different image for each screen resolution you wish to support. If you want to that is. You could always do the generic 800X600 only, screw the smaller resolution and let things get increasingly smaller for higher resolutions.