/    Sign up×
Community /Pin to ProfileBookmark

Class.

Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
Sep 19.2004

Hiya.

Any idea why this piece of CSS isn’t working in IE 5.01? I know it’s an old browser, but just wondered if there was a way to fix it, as it’s the only piece of our site that doesn’t render correctly.

[code=php]
#maincontent .seperation {
border-top: 3px double #CCCCCC;
}
[/code]

We’re using it with <p class=”seperation”></p>

Thanks.

Regards,

to post a comment
CSS

9 Comments(s) ↴

Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@Daniel_TSep 19.2004 — I don't believe IE5 supports double borders...
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@DanUKauthorSep 19.2004 — Ah, must've been fixed in 5.5, seems fine in this version.
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@FangSep 19.2004 — Should be no problem, supported from IE4.
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@DanUKauthorSep 19.2004 — Hi Fang.

Any ideas why IE5.01 doesn't show it then? Something to do with the way I formed the CSS or anything?

Once this is done, our layout (fully CSS) and quite complexish works in:

IE 4.01, 5.01, 5.5, 6

Firefox 08->

Opera 7.26->

Netscape 7.x

Mozilla 1.x

Konqueror 3.1->

Safari 1.2

any others I haven't been able to test.

This is why it's just this one silly seperator that isn't working and it's driving me mad! Hehehe!

Thanks a million.

Regards,
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@Daniel_TSep 19.2004 — Odd... any chance you could upload a sample page?
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@Paul_JrSep 20.2004 — It seems IE 5.0 has a problem with empty elements. Add &amp;nbsp; between the start and end tags, and you should be good to go.
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@David_HarrisonSep 20.2004 — I would be interested to see your layout, it's not that I don't believe you, but it just seems ... unlikely that it will work in IE4.
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@DanUKauthorSep 20.2004 — Paul Jr: Thank you ever so much. Adding the nbsp; has indeed fixed it. ?

lavalamp: I should edit that post, I pasted it directly from a "working site" page - and although IE4 is listed, it doesn't render correctly at all. Sorry about that. The rest seem accurate though.
Copy linkTweet thisAlerts:
@Paul_JrSep 21.2004 — [i]Originally posted by skydan [/i]

[B]Paul Jr: Thank you ever so much. Adding the nbsp; has indeed fixed it. ?[/B][/QUOTE]
No problemo! ?
×

Success!

Help @DanUK spread the word by sharing this article on Twitter...

Tweet This
Sign in
Forgot password?
Sign in with TwitchSign in with GithubCreate Account
about: ({
version: 0.1.9 — BETA 5.2,
whats_new: community page,
up_next: more Davinci•003 tasks,
coming_soon: events calendar,
social: @webDeveloperHQ
});

legal: ({
terms: of use,
privacy: policy
});
changelog: (
version: 0.1.9,
notes: added community page

version: 0.1.8,
notes: added Davinci•003

version: 0.1.7,
notes: upvote answers to bounties

version: 0.1.6,
notes: article editor refresh
)...
recent_tips: (
tipper: @Yussuf4331,
tipped: article
amount: 1000 SATS,

tipper: @darkwebsites540,
tipped: article
amount: 10 SATS,

tipper: @Samric24,
tipped: article
amount: 1000 SATS,
)...