Menu
Community /Pin to ProfileBookmark
@cootheadMar 21.2021 — #
To have any credibility, assertions such as this should
always have links to sources that may justify them.
[i]coothead[/i]@cootheadMar 22.2021 — #Hi there VITSUSA,
Well done for supplying the source link for your assertion.
Please insure that you always do this in your future posts.
There is, of course, a problem with that site's assertion as
it also makes the same unverified claim that you parroted.
What it does say about this claim is....
...which would make any rational person question the
validity of the whole article.
[i]coothead[/i]@cootheadMar 23.2021 — #
I have no problem focusing on questions.
The problem with your question is that it is
based on assertions made in your preamble
to it which are not in any way creditable.
[i]coothead[/i]@cootheadMar 23.2021 — #
I may focus on your questions when you stop applying false
or unverified facts to them.
I checked out your source(sic) link, and found this disturbing
statement...
...do you honestly expect me to believe...
...after reading that.
If I created a post like this...
...would you question my assertion or just answer it
with your solution to this perceived problem ?
[i]coothead[/i]
Increase revenue with call tracking
Telephone calls remain one of the most primary means of making contact. Even today, 60% of consumers prefer to pick up the phone
If your customer is calling, so how you increase your revenue with call tracking?
Sign in
to post a comment13 Comments(s) ↴
0
@cootheadMar 21.2021 — #>@VITSUSA#1629117
>
> [b][color=navy]Even today, 60% of consumers prefer to pick up the phone[/color] [/b]
To have any credibility, assertions such as this should
always have links to sources that may justify them.
[i]coothead[/i]
0
@cootheadMar 22.2021 — #Hi there VITSUSA,Well done for supplying the source link for your assertion.
Please insure that you always do this in your future posts.
There is, of course, a problem with that site's assertion as
it also makes the same unverified claim that you parroted.
What it does say about this claim is....
[color=#008][i]"The white paper or webinar content described below has
been produced by one of our sponsors."[/i][/color]
[/quote]
...which would make any rational person question the
validity of the whole article.
[i]coothead[/i]
0
@cootheadMar 23.2021 — #>@VITSUSA#1629549
>
>[color=#009] I think you should focus on questions as well.[/color]
I have no problem focusing on questions.
The problem with your question is that it is
based on assertions made in your preamble
to it which are not in any way creditable.
[i]coothead[/i]
0
@cootheadMar 23.2021 — #>@VITSUSA
>[color="#009"]I think you should focus on questions[/color]
I may focus on your questions when you stop applying false
or unverified facts to them.
I checked out your source(sic) link, and found this disturbing
statement...
>[color=#009][i]"The white paper or webinar content described below has
been produced by one of our sponsors."[/i][/color]
...do you honestly expect me to believe...
>[color="#009"]Even today, 60% of consumers prefer to pick up the phone[/color]
...after reading that.
If I created a post like this...
>[color="#009"]Even today, 60% of this forum are posting bullshit.
> How can we reduce that figure?[/color]
...would you question my assertion or just answer it
with your solution to this perceived problem ?
[i]coothead[/i]