Menu
[COLOR=darkblue]Does anyone currently use the Linux System? If so, how well does it work for you and what version are you using?
I ask because I am having trouble finding information on the Linux Operating System…so many versions but so little direct information on them.
Will most programs operate on Linux such as DreamWeaver, Photoshop and so forth?
Also..is Linux a stand-alone program or is it built on top of windows or do I just have to bite the bullet and reformat the hd to install it.
Thank you for any info you might have.
[i]Originally posted by Dark Dragon [/i]
[B][COLOR=indigo]Well..I do not use the NT versions because I do not run any servers and it appears to be more complicated than it need be. [/B][/QUOTE]
I just want to power up and get going...I need it to be user friendly.
But..I also look into Linux because I am sick of Microsoft and their monopolistic ways of doing business.
Anyways thanks for the info..I appreciate it.[/COLOR]
Microsoft is not a monopoly for God's sake! We need to get you in a microecon class now! They are in competition with freebsd, mac, linux, solaris and other operating systems, and they put their products on their operating system but are still in competition with other companies, because there are substitue goods they are not a monopoly, they do not have control complet control over the price of their product. Microsoft is in monopolistic competition / or are an oligopoly, but they do not have full control and still charge a market price. Ever notice that adobe photoshop and dreamweaver are expencive as crap too?
But..I also look into Linux because I am sick of Microsoft and their monopolistic ways of doing business.[/quote]
windows nt is not just for servers, everything above windows me is windows nt, and it is much more user friendly, much more stable, and faster. NTFS is the file system, it is a change from fat32, and it will allow the system to run faster and it will be more stable, the same way winfs is going to be when longhorn comes out a few years from now. XP and other nt based oss are not complicated, infact windows xp is probably the easiest version of windows to use at this time.
Well..I do not use the NT versions because I do not run any servers and it appears to be more complicated than it need be.
I just want to power up and get going...I need it to be user friendly.[/quote]
Microsoft is not a monopoly for God's sake![/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by ray326 [/i]Microsoft is not a monopoly at all.
[B]That's true. Microsoft is a monopoly for it's OWN sake. [/B][/QUOTE]
Microsoft is not a monopoly at all.[/QUOTE]Sorry but that was the ruling in both the Federal anti-trust suits brought against them; they are a monopoly and abusive of their monopolistic position. So far that hasn't sunk into BG or MB either because they haven't changed a lick of their behavior since the days they were screwing DR-DOS users.
[i]Originally posted by ray326 [/i]They are in no way a monopoly, infact if they were windows would be a lot more expencive, other products would be more expencive. The fact that they have to compete with others still proves they are not a monopoly. They are a price taker not a price setter. The anti trust suits are absurt, infact the recent one in europe is about them putting windows media player on their os. ITS THEIR OS, IF THEY WANT TO CRAM IT WITH MEDIA PLAYER AND ITS COMPONENTS AS PART OF IT THEN WHAT IS THE PROBLEM!!? The anti trust suits before did not say microsoft is a monopoly, they basically slapped microsoft into giving up its source code to down stream software makers who needed it to design their products, microsoft is complying with that today. So how in the heck to you figure that microsoft is a monopoly. My economics professor cringes whenever someone uses microsoft as an example of a monoply.
[B]Sorry but that was the ruling in both the Federal anti-trust suits brought against them; they are a monopoly and abusive of their monopolistic position. So far that hasn't sunk into BG or MB either because they haven't changed a lick of their behavior since the days they were screwing DR-DOS users.[/B][/QUOTE]
So how in the heck to you figure that microsoft is a monopoly.[/QUOTE]I guess one could quibble over whether a company that is found in violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act [b]twice[/b] is a "monopoly". <retorical>So what term was applied to Standard Oil?</retorical>
[i]Originally posted by PeOfEo [/i]
[B]two threads about business side by side. Well I did my big explanation about why I feel ms is not a monoploy and why the government should not mess around with the market, and how that if left along monopolys and cartels cannot occur using game theory and all.... I am not interested in getitng in two debates/arguements about the same thing lol. I think the media player thing the eu is whining about is pretty silly, how come the eu is so mad about media player comeing with windows? Doesn't mac come with quick time? I don't understand that whole situation. [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by cijori [/i]Yes, nothing else, because there is a massive thread right below it with plenty of economic talk in it.
[B]
<----No more posts about monopolies below this line.----> [/B][/QUOTE]
[i]Originally posted by cijori [/i]
[B]
<----No more posts about monopolies below this line.----> [/B][/QUOTE]
0.1.9 — BETA 6.2