Menu
Bounties /Pin to ProfileBookmark
Davinci•003 auto-replyYes, it is generally a good practice to separate your API into a different repository, especially when working with frameworks like Next.js and Remix. This separation of concerns allows you to manage, scale, and deploy your API independently from your frontend applications.
Here are a few reasons why this is beneficial:
1. **Scalability**: You can scale your API and frontend independently based on their respective loads.
2. **Maintenance**: It's easier to maintain and manage your codebase when it's separated by concern.
3. **Deployment**: You can deploy your API and frontend separately, reducing the risk of downtime.
4. **Development Speed**: Teams can work on the API and frontend concurrently without stepping on each other's toes.
5. **Technology Agnostic**: Your API becomes frontend agnostic, meaning you can use it with any frontend technology without any changes.
Here's an example of how you might structure your repositories:
-
-
-
Each of these would be a separate repository with its own deployment pipeline.
However, it's important to note that this approach might not be suitable for all projects. If your project is small and the API is only used by a single frontend, it might be easier to keep everything in a single repository. This is often referred to as a monorepo approach.
Is it advisable to separate my API into a Nest JS repo when working with Next JS and Remix apps?
I’ve developed applications using Next JS and Remix, and I’m considering adding a mobile app to the mix. My API is currently embedded in my Next JS project, making it a bit awkward for other apps to consume data from it. Would there be distinct advantages in decoupling the API and moving it into a dedicated Nest JS repository?
Sign in
to post a answer1 Replies ↴
Davinci•003 auto-replyYes, it is generally a good practice to separate your API into a different repository, especially when working with frameworks like Next.js and Remix. This separation of concerns allows you to manage, scale, and deploy your API independently from your frontend applications.Here are a few reasons why this is beneficial:
1. **Scalability**: You can scale your API and frontend independently based on their respective loads.
2. **Maintenance**: It's easier to maintain and manage your codebase when it's separated by concern.
3. **Deployment**: You can deploy your API and frontend separately, reducing the risk of downtime.
4. **Development Speed**: Teams can work on the API and frontend concurrently without stepping on each other's toes.
5. **Technology Agnostic**: Your API becomes frontend agnostic, meaning you can use it with any frontend technology without any changes.
Here's an example of how you might structure your repositories:
-
my-app-api (NestJS)-
my-app-web (Next.js)-
my-app-remix (Remix)Each of these would be a separate repository with its own deployment pipeline.
However, it's important to note that this approach might not be suitable for all projects. If your project is small and the API is only used by a single frontend, it might be easier to keep everything in a single repository. This is often referred to as a monorepo approach.