|
|||||||
| Domain Names Discussion of various issues involving domain names. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do some site require "www" at the front of the domain and some don't
Can anyone explain? The sites that require www will not resolve if you don't add it. Most sites seem to allow you to optionallly use it.
Thanks, |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The resolution of the www host/subdomain is not automatic or necessarily configured by default when a domain name is registered and pointed at an IP address. A DNS record must be added "manually" to resolve hosts/subdomains. The www host/subdomain is typically added manually, or may be auto-added by some DNS management software, as an alias to the primary domain.
However, as I understand it, there is nothing inherent to the DNS system that will point any subdomain to the primary domain without a manually created entry. Additionally, the web server often needs some configuration to respond properly to the various host/subdomain requests that could come in, and in some cases, apache is/can be configured to ignore requests for domains and subdomains/hosts that are not explicitly allowed. That all makes sense in my head ... does it make sense in text?
__________________
Jon Wire Webmaster and Author of Ridiculousness why is the sun so hot? | fling poo! | Social Bookmarking (BETA (but still really bloody cool)) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
That seems like a good explaination to me.
What do you think about people putting 301 redirects on the non www. address to redirect to the www. version? A lot of SEO companies seem to recomend it but I don't beleive it makes any difference.
__________________
web hosting |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Were you given any reason why one should implement that redirect?
__________________
Jon Wire Webmaster and Author of Ridiculousness why is the sun so hot? | fling poo! | Social Bookmarking (BETA (but still really bloody cool)) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was reading up on a similar topic a few months ago and there is a movement to abolish the www prefix altogether since it seems redundant.
http://no-www.org/ On the flip side there are working groups for the opposite as well: http://www.yes-www.org/ |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|